Aug 25, 2009
Q & A
Long-term government bonds outperformed the S&P 500 Index by 0.12% per year for the forty-year period ending March 2009. Does a negative risk premium for stocks vs. bonds over such a long period challenge conventional thinking about risk and return?
EFF/KRF: It is important to distinguish between the expected equity premium, which should be positive, and the realized premium, which is the expected premium plus the unexpected premium. Investing in stocks is risky because we do not know what the unexpected premium will be.
Uncertainty about the average unexpected premium is smaller for longer investment horizons, so if we invest for many years the average unexpected premium will typically be close to zero. As a result, the premium of equities over bonds - the sum of the positive expected premium and the random unexpected premium - is likely to be positive over long investment horizons. But over any finite horizon, no matter how long, there is a positive probability that the premium will be negative. Without this long-term uncertainty, we would see simple arbitrage opportunities between stocks and bonds. Suppose, for example, we all know stocks will beat bonds over every forty year period. If stocks lose to bonds over the next 39 years, who would buy bonds in the 40th year? In fact, in that case we could make as much money as we want in the 40th year with no risk by simply shorting bonds and using the proceeds to invest in stocks.
FAMA AND FRENCH ON OTHER TOPICS
CATEGORIES:
Academics (1),
diversification (1),
Economic Policy (16),
Financial Markets (22),
Investments (57),
Market Efficiency (18),
Markets Work (1),
Structure (1),
ABOUT FAMA AND FRENCH
Eugene F. Fama
The Robert R.
McCormick Distinguished
Service Professor of
Finance at the University
of Chicago Booth School
of Business
Kenneth R. French
The Carl E. and Catherine
M. Heidt Professor of
Finance at the Tuck
School of Business at
Dartmouth College
SECTIONS
CATEGORIES
Financial Markets (22)
Market Efficiency (18)
Economic Policy (16)
Investments (57)
Market Efficiency (18)
Economic Policy (16)
Investments (57)
SEARCH
Enter a word or phrase to search for.
SUBSCRIBE
Enter your e-mail address to receive updates.
This article is distributed for educational purposes and should not be considered investment advice or an offer of any security for sale. This article contains the opinions of the author but not necessarily Dimensional Fund Advisors and does not represent a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Dimensional Fund Advisors is an investment advisor registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed. Past performance is not indicative of future results and no representation is made that the stated results will be replicated.
Dimensional Fund Advisors Ltd. is authorised and regulated in the United Kingdom by the Financial Services Authority (FRN: 150100), is registered in England and Wales under Company No. 02569601 and VAT No. 577327607. The registered office address of Dimensional Fund Advisors Ltd. is 7 Down Street, London, W1J 7AJ, United Kingdom. Dimensional Fund Advisors Ltd. is a subsidiary of Dimensional Fund Advisors.
Dimensional Fund Advisors Ltd. is authorised and regulated in the United Kingdom by the Financial Services Authority (FRN: 150100), is registered in England and Wales under Company No. 02569601 and VAT No. 577327607. The registered office address of Dimensional Fund Advisors Ltd. is 7 Down Street, London, W1J 7AJ, United Kingdom. Dimensional Fund Advisors Ltd. is a subsidiary of Dimensional Fund Advisors.
